Impact-Site-Verification: 9a9b300a-4531-4d09-948d-7d6fb53f5a3fImpact-Site-Verification: b1a0f7f7-4af8-4172-9f19-79c724a60e86
PoolGearGuide

How We Review

A review is only as good as the work behind it, so let's be precise about what PoolGearGuide does — and doesn't — do before recommending anything.

What our reviews are right now

Our current reviews are research-based. For every product we review, we work through:

  • Manufacturer documentation — spec sheets, owner's manuals, and support pages, which say more about a product than its marketing page does.
  • Warranty and return terms — one of the strongest honest signals of how much a manufacturer trusts its own hardware.
  • Verified owner feedback at scale — patterns across hundreds or thousands of owner reports, not cherry-picked quotes. One angry review means nothing; two hundred people reporting the same cable tangle means something.
  • Retailer listings — kit contents, availability, and how the product is actually sold.

Every review page carries a notice saying exactly this. When we can't verify a claim, the page says "not confirmed" instead of guessing.

What we never do

  • Claim hands-on testing we didn't do.
  • Invent prices, measurements, specs, or warranty terms.
  • Use "lab tested" wording for products without test evidence.
  • Let affiliate commissions touch a score (see our affiliate disclosure).

How we score (the rubric)

Every product review carries a 0–10 overall score built from six weighted dimensions. We publish the per-dimension bars so you can re-weight for what you care about — a renter and a pool-service pro shouldn't read the same number the same way. Here's exactly what each dimension measures:

  • Cleaning performance (25%) — coverage (floor, walls, waterline), filtration fineness, brushing, and how well it handles the debris the product is sold for, cross-checked against owner reports of what it misses.
  • Value (20%) — capability per dollar at typical street price, including what you don't have to buy separately. Not "cheapest" — cost-to-benefit.
  • Ease of use (15%) — weight, retrieval, filter access, setup, and day-to-day fuss: the things that decide whether you actually run it.
  • Durability outlook (15%) — build, wear parts, warranty length and terms, and the depth of the brand's parts-and-service network.
  • Features (10%) — scheduling, app control, mapping, self-cleaning and extras, scored by usefulness rather than spec-sheet length.
  • Owner sentiment (15%) — the direction and consistency of verified owner feedback at scale, not cherry-picked quotes.

Scores are editorial opinions, stated as such, and they never move because a product pays a higher commission (see our affiliate disclosure). When a dimension can't be verified, we say "not confirmed" rather than padding the number.

Where this is heading

As the site grows we plan to add genuine hands-on testing, starting with robotic pool cleaners. When that happens, hands-on reviews will be labeled as such, with photos, test dates, and measured results — and the research-based label stays on everything else. A review only gets to say "we tested it" when we actually did.